“Project Motor Racing: Overcoming Challenges to Enhance the Racing Experience”

Project Motor Racing: A Unique Concept with Room for Improvement Project Motor Racing presents an intriguing concept that captivates motorsport enthusiasts. However, the execution of this idea requires significant enhancements to fully realize its potential and engage a broader audience. By focusing on refining key elements and delivering a more polished experience, Project Motor Racing can elevate its offering and attract greater interest within the competitive racing community.

Here are the facts: Positioned at the back of the grid at Mount Panorama, the anticipation builds for the race ahead. However, the sight of cars facing the wrong direction signals imminent chaos. This scenario encapsulates the current state of Project Motor Racing, where the promise of exhilarating racing devolves into disarray.

On the surface, Project Motor Racing appeals to racing enthusiasts with its diverse lineup of cars, including often-overlooked models. It avoids pay-to-win mechanics and is not primarily focused on multiplayer experiences. However, the game suffers from significant shortcomings. The AI appears oblivious to player presence on the track, the penalty system disrupts race flow, and various bugs hinder gameplay.

The facts

This title is presented as a spiritual successor to the Project CARS franchise, which faded after the Codemasters acquisition of Slightly Mad Studios and the later EA takeover. While the new developer, Straight4 Studios, introduces different branding, it feels as though they have resurrected Slightly Mad’s vision with minor tweaks. The game aims to continue where Project CARS 2 left off, dismissing the more casual approach of Project CARS 3. Unfortunately, the execution resembles a poorly made sequel reminiscent of a less favorable film.

Career mode options

Despite its flaws, the single-player career mode has a solid foundation. One appealing feature is the flexible starting budgets, allowing players to customize their career path. Players can choose a modest budget to enter entry-level categories or opt for a larger sum to dive straight into top-tier racing. Additionally, the game supports multiple career saves, enabling experimentation without interfering with others’ progress, enhancing gameplay.

In terms of in-game earnings, players can tailor their preferences. For instance, they may decide on a straightforward payout per event, pursue bonuses for victory, or manage finances through repair costs based on race earnings. This variety caters to different playstyles, which is commendable.

The frustration of racing

However, the management aspect plateaus without engaging elements. Players cannot customize team appearances or apply sponsor logos to their cars, detracting from the experience, especially compared to titles like NASCAR 25. While mod support is a touted feature on PC and consoles, it may not fully address this gap in customization.

Once players have their team and vehicle, the campaign mode becomes a straightforward affair of selecting championships or events and paying entry fees. The goal aligns with real-life race drivers: compete on renowned tracks and strive for victory while managing team finances. Yet, enjoyment is severely diminished by frustrating AI and a penalty system that feels disproportionately punitive.

AI and penalty system issues

The AI drivers often behave as if players are invisible, leading to chaotic racing experiences. Their tendency to collide with vehicles while adhering stubbornly to the racing line is vexing, especially in the absence of proximity indicators or radar to warn of nearby competitors. On consoles, the AI count is limited to just 15, which feels inadequate for a racing simulator of this caliber. Given their erratic behavior, it may be a blessing that there are not more aggressive drivers on the track.

The penalty system complicates matters further. Minor transgressions, often instigated by AI drivers, can result in harsh penalties that unravel otherwise solid races. Unlike other games such as Assetto Corsa Competizione, which penalizes only when an advantage is gained, Project Motor Racing punishes players for mistakes that have already cost them time. This inconsistency can ruin the rhythm of a well-paced race and create frustration.

Visuals and performance

Visually, Project Motor Racing features a commendable selection of over 70 cars; however, the aesthetic experience falls short during races. The graphics appear washed out, lacking the vibrancy of its predecessor, Project CARS 2. Damage models and weather effects also leave much to be desired, resulting in a less immersive experience. While the sound design captures the essence of racing, it could benefit from richer engine sounds and overall depth.

On the surface, Project Motor Racing appeals to racing enthusiasts with its diverse lineup of cars, including often-overlooked models. It avoids pay-to-win mechanics and is not primarily focused on multiplayer experiences. However, the game suffers from significant shortcomings. The AI appears oblivious to player presence on the track, the penalty system disrupts race flow, and various bugs hinder gameplay.0

On the surface, Project Motor Racing appeals to racing enthusiasts with its diverse lineup of cars, including often-overlooked models. It avoids pay-to-win mechanics and is not primarily focused on multiplayer experiences. However, the game suffers from significant shortcomings. The AI appears oblivious to player presence on the track, the penalty system disrupts race flow, and various bugs hinder gameplay.1

Scritto da Staff

Mastering Automotive Technology and Service Skills for Career Advancement